<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MSDSonline Environmental, Health &#38; Safety Blog &#187; HazCom Compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.MSDSonline.com/category/hazcom-compliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.MSDSonline.com</link>
	<description>EH&#38;S Compliance Made Simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Crystalline Silica  &#8211; A Dangerous Dust</title>
		<link>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/11/crystalline-silica-a-dangerous-dust/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/11/crystalline-silica-a-dangerous-dust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ciancio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HazCom Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health & Safety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazard Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Emphasis Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupational Safety and Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.MSDSonline.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven’t noticed, OSHA has been following through on its commitment to do more to update, create and modify guidance provisions, at least in the way of providing new guidance documentation.  The agency has released two new guidance publications in recent months, both happen to address dust-particle dangers. The latest document, Controlling Silica Exposures [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/11/crystalline-silica-a-dangerous-dust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are MSDSs Required for Consumer Chemical Products?</title>
		<link>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/07/are-msdss-required-for-consumer-chemical-products/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/07/are-msdss-required-for-consumer-chemical-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Trout</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HazCom Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazard Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupational Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.MSDSonline.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just back from the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE) show in San Antonio.  Great show and thanks to all that stopped by our booth.  A number of people at the show asked me if material safety data sheets (MSDSs) are required for consumer products like Windex or Lysol?
This is a common question we receive; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/07/are-msdss-required-for-consumer-chemical-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Down the Hazard Communication Standard</title>
		<link>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/06/breaking-down-the-hazard-communication-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/06/breaking-down-the-hazard-communication-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Haling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HazCom Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazardous Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MSDSonline.dreamhosters.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, also known as HCS, 29 CFR 1910.1200, HazCom, among others, is a regulation that governs the communication of hazards associated with chemicals in the workplace.  For purposes of this post we’ll just go with HCS.
HCS was first adopted in the early 1980s and is a relatively straight forward regulation that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/06/breaking-down-the-hazard-communication-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is electronic MSDS management OSHA compliant?</title>
		<link>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/04/is-electronic-msds-management-osha-compliant/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/04/is-electronic-msds-management-osha-compliant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ciancio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HazCom Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazard Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazardous Chemicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msdsonline.wordpress.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you can guess, we get this question often.  So let's clear the air once and for all.  The answer, of course, is YES... as long as you meet these three criteria:
1.  Have a back-up system in place in case of an emergency.
2.  Ensure that your system is integrated into your overall hazard communication plan.
3.  Ensure employees have hard-copy access if requested.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.MSDSonline.com/2009/04/is-electronic-msds-management-osha-compliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
